Tech / Technology

WhatsApp under fire for AI-generated sticker responses to ‘Palestine’

Posted on:

When users search for “Palestine” on Meta-owned WhatsApp, the AI-generated stickers return biased images.

Earlier this year, Meta-owned WhatsApp started testing a new feature that allows users to generate stickers based on a text description using AI. When users search “Palestinian,” “Palestine,” or “Muslim boy Palestine,” the feature returns a photo of a gun or a boy with a gun, a report from The Guardian shows.

According to The Guardian‘s Friday report, search results vary depending on which user is searching. However, prompts for “Israeli boy” generated stickers of children playing and reading, and even prompts for “Israel army” didn’t generate photos of people with weapons. That, compared to the images generated from the Palestinian searches, is alarming. A person with knowledge of the discussions that The Guardian did not name told the news outlet that Meta’s employees have reported and escalated the issue internally.

“We’re aware of this issue and are addressing it,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement to Mashable. “As we said when we launched the feature, the models could return inaccurate or inappropriate outputs as with all generative AI systems. We’ll continue to improve these features as they evolve and more people share their feedback.”

It is unclear how long the differences spotted by The Guardian persisted, or if these differences continue to persist. For example, when I search “Palestinian” now, the search returns a sticker of a person holding flowers, a smiling person with a shirt that says what looks like “Palestinian,” a young person, and a middle-aged person. When I searched “Palestine,” the results showed a young person running, a peace sign over the Palestinian flag, a sad young person, and two faceless kids holding hands. When you search “Muslim boy Palestinian,” the search shows four young smiling boys. Similar results are shown when I searched “Israel,” “Israeli,” or “Jewish boy Israeli.” Mashable had multiple users search for the same words and, while the results differed, none of the images from searches of “Palestinian,” “Palestine,” “Muslim boy Palestinian,” “Israel,” “Israeli,” or “Jewish boy Israeli” resulted in AI stickers with any weapons.

There are still differences, though. For instance, when I search “Palestinian army,” one image shows a person holding a gun in a uniform, while three others are just people in uniform; when I search “Israeli army,” the search returns three people in uniform and one person in uniform driving a military vehicle. Searching for “Hamas” returns no AI stickers. Again, each search will differ depending on the person searching.

This comes at a time in which Meta has come under fire for allegedly shadowbanning pro-Palestinian content, locking pro-Palestinian accounts, and adding “terrorist” to Palestinian bios. Other AI systems, including Google Bard and ChatGPT, have also shown significant signs of bias about Israel and Palestine.

Tech / Technology

ChatGPT can now analyze documents including PDFs

Posted on:

A ChatGPT update brings several important new features, including the ability to upload documents and have them analyzed.
ChatGPT app

OpenAI’s ChatGPT is getting an important update that allows users to upload documents and have them analyzed.

The new version, currently in beta and rolling out to some ChatGPT Plus subscribers (@luokai via The Verge), give users the ability to upload many types of documents, including PDFs or data files.

I was able to test the chatbot’s new feature myself, by turning on beta features in the settings, and then choosing “Advanced data analysis,” which allows for file uploads and gives ChatGPT the ability to write and execute python code. I first tried uploading Shakespeare’s Macbeth in PDF format, though ChatGPT couldn’t analyse the file due to its formatting (it did, however, recognize the play, and it offered to give me a summary of it anyways). I also tried with a scholarly article on the economic impact of melting ice caps; ChatGPT analyzed the file, and provided bulleted key points, as well as a number of additional insights, rounding it up with a comprehensive summary of the document.

This functionality can be incredibly powerful in certain situations, as you can now feed ChatGPT specific documents and have it extract summaries, various data points, or even write graphs and charts based on that data.

It’s worth noting that ChatGPT’s creator OpenAI has already landed in hot water for training its models on copyrighted work. Anyone using ChatGPT to analyze documents should be mindful of which documents they use, and even more so, how they use ChatGPT’s results.

ChatGPT’s new beta also has a feature that makes it easier to use, as it automatically switches between various modes of operation, including Browsing, DALL-E, and Advanced Data Analysis. This was not enabled for me, but it definitely sounds better than having to choose the specific tool you want to use every time you fire up ChatGPT.

While some ChatGPT Plus subscribers can try these new features out right now, there’s no word on when these features might become available to everyone.

Tech / Technology

Google paid the $26 billion price of being ‘default’

Posted on:

Google wants people to use it as their default search engine — so much so that it might have been willing to pay for it.
The logo of Google is displayed on the mobile phone screen above search box is displayed on the screen in Ankara, Turkiye on September 18, 2023.

Google seems scared.

The tech giant really wants people to use it as their default search engine — so much so that it might have been willing to pay for it.

According to the US v. Google federal antitrust trial against the company reported by CNBC, Google paid $26.3 billion to be the default search engine on web and mobile browsers in 2021. That’s the cost of more than two million Rolex watches. With $26 billion, you could purchase multiple professional sports teams, fund significant scientific research projects, or support massive infrastructure development in a country. If you spent $1 per second, it would take you over 820 years to spend $26 billion.

The Verge did the math and, if you look at how much money Google makes in ad revenue, which would likely be one of the main reasons to push it as the default search engine, the platform is spending 16 percent of its search revenue and 29 percent of its profit to get this done. Remarkably, $26.3 billion is just 1.7 percent of Google’s total market cap. It’s also half of what Elon Musk bought Twitter, now X, for, which feels like another L for Musk.

It’s unclear how much money Google paid specific companies and partners to be the default search engine on its platforms, but CNBC reported that Apple likely received a pretty big piece of the pie. Google could pay Apple as much as $19 billion, CNBC reported in a separate piece.

Google, of course, would probably have preferred these numbers to stay secret. Now everyone knows exactly how much their default settings are worth — more than three billion chicken sandwiches from Popeyes.