Tech / Technology

Nintendo is making a ‘Legend of Zelda’ live-action film

Posted on:

Nintendo is making a live-action “The Legend of Zelda” movie directed by Wes Ball and produced by Shigeru Miyamoto and Avi Arad.

Nintendo has announced it is making a live-action The Legend of Zelda movie. Let the casting speculation begin.

The project has apparently been in the works for some time, with Maze Runner‘s Wes Ball already set to direct. The Legend of Zelda film will be co-produced by Nintendo’s Representative Director Shigeru Miyamoto and Arad Productions’ Chairman Avi Arad.

The founder and former CEO of Marvel Studios, Arad has been the producer on a long list of films such as Morbius, Uncharted, and Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse. He was also executive producer on all three Tom Holland Spider-Man films.

“I have been working on the live-action film of The Legend of Zelda for many years now with Avi Arad-san, who has produced many mega hit films,” Miyamoto wrote on Nintendo’s official X / Twitter account. 

“I have asked Avi-san to produce this film with me, and we have now officially started the development of the film with Nintendo itself heavily involved in the production. It will take time until its completion, but I hope you look forward to seeing it.”

Deadline reports that the adaptation will be written by screenwriter Derek Connolly. Connolly has previously penned Jurassic World, Detective Pikachu, and co-wrote the story for Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.

No details have been released regarding whether the Legend of Zelda film will be based on any of the video games in the franchise, or if it will follow an original story. It will be co-financed by Nintendo and Sony Pictures Entertainment, with the latter also taking care of global theatrical distribution.

Nintendo’s Hollywood ambitions have likely been galvanised by the recent success of The Super Mario Bros. Movie. The video game adaptation earned $1.3 billion at the global box office, making it the second biggest animated film in history. It also made some pretty drastic changes to Mario’s iconic voice, demonstrating that audiences probably won’t be too put off if Legend of Zelda protagonist Link finally breaks his famous silence.

Tech / Technology

Twitter users still resisting X name change months later

Posted on:

Months after Elon Musk changed Twitter’s name to X, users fight to change the name back. Stephen King is speaking out. Now what?
A woman wearing a Twitter logo in the style of the mockingjay from Hunger Games fires an arrow at a giant X atop a skyscraper.

It’s three months since the official change, and reports of the death of Twitter — as a name, that is — have been greatly exaggerated.

“This X shit’s got to go,” author Stephen King tweeted Thursday. That post received 71,000 likes by the end of the day. Elon Musk, creator of “this X shit,” responded to King with a “XX” and a winking-kiss emoji. Musk’s reply had a relatively tiny 7,300 likes at time of writing, despite the fact that Musk has 150 million more followers than King.

It was another humiliation for Musk, who has frequently tried to bring King, one of his favorite writers, on board with his controversial plans for the service. But it was also a crucial temperature-taking of the Twitter community. “Everyone literally still just calls it Twitter,” said one of the most popular replies. “I cannot explain to my friends what X is,” said another.

These are no mere anecdotes. A Harris Poll/Ad Age survey in mid-September found that some 69% of U.S. adults still refer to the platform as Twitter. A Chrome extension that scrubs all mentions of X from Twitter.com has more than 100,000 users. All of which raises an interesting question: If Elon Musk is trying to make fetch happen, and fetch doesn’t seem to be happening, and a significant chunk of his users say that fetch is never, ever going to happen … what happens next?

Musk owns the service, of course, and can call it whatever he likes. The company providing the service is legally known as X Corp. But the English language is a democracy, and if most of us are still calling the service Twitter, then Twitter it is. English itself is on the side of the 69% — or, to give them a more appropriate name, the Twitter resistance.

Musk is, as in many things, his own worst enemy here. The slapdash nature of the name-change rollout means that uses of “Twitter” and “tweets” are still all over the website, the app, the email communications. Most representations are beyond his control. The bird logo is embedded so many places on the internet and IRL, scrubbing it out would take years of work by more employees than … well, than Musk has already fired.

Ironically, given Musk’s propensity for media bashing, the media may be his biggest ally in making X happen. Some outlets such as Wired have changed their style guide to call Twitter X. Others use the “X, formerly Twitter” construction. If enough people over enough time read enough news about Twitter that calls the service X, and it rubs off on them, then you may not have to explain to your friends what X is anymore. The linguistic vote would start to tilt in Musk’s favor.

Twitter vs. X, round 1

Let’s recap, because you may still have a hard time believing that “this X shit” even happened. Reality sounds like a bad movie pitch: World’s richest man, having massively overpaid for one of the most beloved brands on the internet, kills it. World’s richest man has long been obsessed with the letter X, ignoring everyone who has tried to tell him how shady it sounds.

To drive the point home, this guy also thinks it looks cool to stick a massive “X” on the roof of the beloved brand’s office building (whose owner, by the by, says the world’s richest man has been stiffing him on the rent). It’s a brutal-looking X made out of lights so bright it blinds tenants in the apartments opposite.

At this point, a seasoned Hollywood executive might look incredulous. C’mon, this is like Biff Tannen from Back to the Future meets Mr. Potter from It’s a Wonderful Life! You’re making it too obvious what will happen next: some plucky group of underdogs restores the brand, because he can’t actually force people to use his name! No one is that much of a cartoon villain, surely?

Musk, by accident or design, was determined to make himself seem like a supervillain: “X Luthor,” as more than one Twitter user dubbed him at the time of the name change. Lex Luthor actor Jon Cryer tweeted about the similarity of X corp to that of the fictional LexCorp.

It was almost as if he was begging for a resistance movement to rise against him, as they so often do on Twitter. After all, Musk had handed his foes a perfect ready-made symbol — a bird, just like the Mockingjay worn by Katniss Everdeen in the Hunger Games series. “The bird is freed,” Musk tweeted when he took over a year ago; a Twitter resistance could use that very slogan.

Would the bird logo catch on? Would Twitter’s millions of users protest the change by switching their avatar to the bird? Would they go dark, like Reddit during a summer of protest, and only log on the bare minimum of times necessary to stop Musk seizing their accounts (which is, apparently, once every several years)?

And a King shall lead them

Well, no, not exactly. Twitter has certainly seen a decline in its daily active users, but what is remarkable is that it hasn’t declined further. More than 200 million people still use the service daily. A majority still call it Twitter, sure; they tweet (rather than post) jokes and memes about Musk’s weird X obsession and dead birds in cages. But they’ve also blithely accepted all the X imagery creeping in around the edges — the horrible faux-marble app icon, the design-school-reject logo — because what can you do, right? Just try not to pay attention to it!

Which is why King’s sudden intercession is so interesting. It’s not that the author was previously unaware of the “X shit”; he still posts very frequently, like many a Musk opponent who once claimed they would quit the service. In fact, he’s not going anywhere. King is taking a stand, pun very much intended, and he may well be the right leader for the moment. He’s folksy. His work is extremely popular in middle America and around the world, including with Musk and friends.

Why now? No reason necessary. We all get it, that moment when you’ve just had enough and vow that an intolerable thing cannot go on (certainly, this has happened to more than a few of King’s characters). The fact that the moment has come three months in makes it that much worse for Musk. King cannot be accused of rushing to judgment.

Whether King continues the charge against X, and whether other high-profile users will join him, remains to be seen. But by calling it out as he sees it, he’s already given the nascent Twitter resistance a powerful weapon in their fight for the old brand. Advertisers, always wary of a New Coke situation, may run away even faster from a service described by the world’s favorite horror writer as “X shit.”

Your move, X Luthor.

Tech / Technology

Stephen King tweets his ‘Salem’s Lot’ remake review

Posted on:

Stephen King has shared his review of Gary Dauberman’s “Salem’s Lot” remake in a series of posts on Twitter/X.
A man with glasses looks serious while talking. Part of a Twitter/X post from Stephen King is visible at the bottom of the image.

Will we ever actually get to see IT writer Gary Dauberman’s remake of Stephen King’s novel ‘Salem’s Lot?

The project has been sitting on the Warner Bros. shelves for a while, but based on King’s recent review, we’re hoping it sees the light of day soon.

The horror master — who isn’t always favourable when he reviews adaptations of his work — took to Twitter/X recently to praise the remake, describing it as “muscular and involving”.

“It has the feel of ‘Old Hollywood,’ when a film was given a chance to draw a breath before getting to business. When attention spans were longer, in other words,” wrote King. “It feels like a horror movie version of slow-burn movies like THE GREAT ESCAPE. It builds very well. There are diversions from the book I don’t agree with, but on the whole, faithful.”

King even went on to describe his favourite scene from the movie, which sounds fittingly gruesome for a story about vampires.

“Best scene: Danny Glick in the hospital, trying to claw down a blood bag,” wrote King. “The Glick scene could have been directed by John Carpenter in his prime.”

Although Salem’s Lot may not be getting a theatrical release, the latest reports suggest it may end up launching on Max. Here’s hoping it’s soon.

Tech / Technology

‘Sly’ review: A Stallone documentary that plays like a ‘Rocky’ sequel`

Posted on:

Netflix’s documentary “Sly,” about Sylvester Stallone, plays like a “Rocky” sequel.

For about its first hour, Sylvester Stallone documentary Sly (directed by Thom Zimny) unfolds with surprising dexterity, journeying across the actor/filmmaker’s early life through the lens of his most iconic roles. Both its subject matter and aesthetic approach make it an effective work of introspection and artistic critique on the surface, even though it eventually loses focus. Playing at times like a missing Rocky documentary, Sly avoids the emotionally thorny material it might otherwise have been able to mine were it not so reverential towards its central star.

It’s the rare documentary feature that might have benefitted from being a longer series, but at 96 minutes in length, it establishes an adequate baseline for those in search of a quick Stallone 101. Talking heads include the actor, his brother Frank, his longtime collaborator John Herzfeld, and various heavy Hollywood hitters, from ’80s rival Arnold Schwarzenegger to Quentin Tarantino.

This patchwork of interviewees seeks to answer the question of who Sylvester Stallone is, even though the subject and the film itself seem rather convinced they have the answer. It’s a look back at a lengthy career and 77 years of life, expanding on key moments of success while brushing uglier elements of the rug. It borders on hagiographical self-promotion — Stallone is an executive producer on the movie, after all — but the way it shines a light on his creative process is entirely worthwhile.

What is Sly about?

Sylvester Stallone in "Sly."


Credit: Netflix

At its outset, Sly offers the appearance of Stallone’s life having come full circle in a meaningful way, as he packs up his lavish Malibu mansion filled with Hollywood memorabilia and plans to move back East. Before his skyrocketing success from writing and starring in Rocky in 1976, Stallone grew up in New York’s rough-and-tumble Hell’s Kitchen, an oral picture of which he paints vividly as he revisits the neighborhood’s now-pristine streets.

Spread between two cities, this narrative framework not only allows Stallone to reflect on people and places from his past, but it also lets Zimny zero in on various statues, action figures and privately commissioned lifelike busts of iconic Stallone characters, including Rocky in his victory pose, as a means to introduce the story of each fictitious avatar through their popular iconography. From there on out, Stallone dives back into tales from his childhood, from growing up with a violent and withholding father, to struggling to be seen as anything more than a talentless lug during his early career.

Stallone, whose obliquely framed, often shaky close-ups make up most of the film, carries himself with a remarkable self-awareness about his limitations, and an equally remarkable critical intellect about what the audience takes away from each of his pictures, and where some of them might have failed. By presenting Rocky Balboa and John Rambo through a psychoanalytical framework, he gives these cinematic heroes their due as more than just hulking ’80s icons; to him, they’re extensions of himself and his father, respectively. Granted, this feels like a conclusion that Sly may have been able to articulate by skillfully building towards as it explored Stallone’s history. Instead, the film leaves little room to uncover emotional mysteries, presenting them instead as thudding and obvious conclusions up front, as articulated by Stallone himself.

The effect of this narrative structure (or lack thereof) is a double-edged sword. It places Stallone’s thoughtfulness on full display, highlighting the artistic intellect he’s so often denied in the public consciousness. On paper, this framing of the actor as someone with an underrated, underappreciated sense of artistry and emotional depth reads like an exercise in further inflating a Hollywood ego, given his involvement in the film. But in execution, Sly also gives Stallone his long-overdue flowers as a creator of meaningful iconography stemming from an emotionally complicated history. 

It’s also cute (and very silly) that, in its final half hour, Sly tries to frame Stallone’s character from The Expendables (whose most recent entry tanked at the box office) as on par with Rocky and Rambo in terms of impact and recognizability. (Do you remember the character’s name? Too bad; the film doesn’t bother to mention it.) This is where it begins to veer off the rails and becomes a re-writing of self-mythology too bold and fictitious to digest. But up until that point, its filmmaking proves deft enough to convince you that we don’t value Stallone’s work in crafting honest and rapturous images nearly as much as we should.

Sly‘s filmmaking tricks work wonders.

Sylvester Stallone in "Sly."


Credit: Netflix

Zimny has worked on numerous music videos and concert films (mostly for the legend Bruce Springsteen), and along with co-editor Annie Salsich, he carries forward his penchant for capturing American iconography in rhythmic ways. There’s a propulsive energy to the film’s use of archival footage and photography, which it swiftly intersperses with interviews of Stallone in the present.

At just the right moments, Sly juxtaposes real-life imagery with brief scenes and stills from Stallone’s movies, linking them emotionally and psychologically through quick cuts, as though it were portraying flashes of inspiration. The documentary is as much about a creative person as it is his creative process, and it skillfully creates the illusion of granting secret access to Stallone’s third eye in the moments it turns inward.

Divorced from the knowledge of Stallone’s involvement, Sly is practically revelatory in the way it uses Rocky and Rambo as avenues for the star to psychoanalyze himself. His interviews about his early career are lucid and candid, especially when he expresses the ways in which cinema allows him to garner the adoration he felt he lacked as a child. However, since Stallone is involved at the end of the day, Sly also creates the unavoidable specter of self-promotion.

For instance, his close-up interviews allow him to be vulnerable, but within filmmaking constraints that work against capturing the full scope of this vulnerability. The movie is quick to cut away from Stallone, rather than holding on his confessions. It bobs and weaves while filming him from up close, as though it were a boxer battling him in the ring — a flourish that works counter to the idea these interviews might be a space of comfort, allowing him to open up more completely. There is a lot to process in Sly, much of it worthwhile, but there’s also a looming sense that something is missing.

Sly doesn’t go the distance.

Sylvester Stallone in "Sly."


Credit: Netflix

A behind-the-scenes peek such as this one serves to remind viewers just how much like Rocky Balboa Stallone truly is, from his cadence and posture to the way he philosophizes and sermonizes in simple, street-smart ways. However, what separates the two is that while the Rocky movies dig deep into the character at his most flawed and susceptible, Sly is unable (or perhaps unwilling) to do the same.

While a good chunk of its runtime is spent on explaining Stallone’s creation of (and frequent return to) the Rocky and Rambo characters, it truncates the last several decades of his career. Unfortunately, Sly ends up doing the same for his personal life, and the documentary is the weaker for it. Its setups about Stallone using pop artistry as a search for meaning and personal fulfillment end up having few payoffs in the process. Its themes of recursiveness and repetition — Stallone’s frequent return to familiar characters and ideas when new ones don’t work out — simply peters out, rather than revealing any layers to him or coming to a cathartic conclusion. 

Worst of all, speeding through Stallone’s life in the 2010s also means reducing the death of his son Sage, who starred alongside him in Rocky V and who has a sizable presence in the documentary via archival footage, to a mere footnote. It’s a part of his story that’s mostly glossed over despite loss becoming a key fixture of his films that would follow, but this is where Stallone’s involvement shows its hand, exposing the limits of self-reflection as a guiding credo for a documentary. 

Sage’s death is, understandably, a private and painful subject, as are many of the topics which Sly glosses over, from Stallone’s divorce to his litany of legal issues. Ignoring them calls into question the movie’s own appearance as an intimate sit-down with one of Hollywood’s biggest stars. The film is a journalistic inquiry, but only on Stallone’s terms. It takes what he offers up and spins it into a finely crafted series of montages, but it never pushes further, never asks for more. It is, by nature, a film that is satisfied with its subject’s party line, all but betraying its documentarian spirit in the first place.

Beyond a point, the later stages of his life are reduced to PR talking points with enormous gaps between them. In the process, this can’t help but reframe the rest of the movie too, casting doubt on how much truth (both emotional and factual) the audience had really been made privy to during the preceding runtime. Taken at its word, there’s enough by way of useful reframing of fictitious iconography, and enough by way of the appearance of vulnerability, to make Sly an engaging watch — right up until the point that it isn’t.

Sly is now streaming on Netflix.

Tech / Technology

‘Nyad’ Review: An exciting drama buoyed by Annette Bening and Jodie Foster

Posted on:

Netflix’s “Nyad,” starring Annette Bening and Jodie Foster, hits familiar biopic beats but works nonetheless. Review.

Formulaic at first glance, the feel-good sports drama Nyad hits every beat you’d expect, but it nails some of them with enough precision that it becomes a rapturous experience. Co-directed by married couple Jimmy Chin and Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi (the Oscar-winning team behind the rock-climbing documentary Free Solo), it tells the real story of a renowned long-distance swimmer coming out of retirement, chronicling her herculean attempts — alongside her team of friends and experts — to push the limits of the human body and spirit by completing an arduous 80-hour swim from Cuba to Miami.

Buoyed by a stellar ensemble, the movie just about conquers its shortcomings in the story department. When Nyad isn’t distracted by biopic conventions, it’s a surprisingly effective procedural about a complicated endeavor, supported by lifelike, multidimensional performances that help it transcend its appearance as a run-of-the-mill “inspirational” Hollywood hagiography.

Unfortunately, when it drops the ball, its flaws are especially noticeable, as it becomes suddenly reliant on a traumatic backstory in ways that, at best, feel narratively misplaced. However, thanks to its unyielding focus on physical strain and suffering — it’s the aquatic Passion of the Christ — it maintains enough stakes and sporadic intensity to get by.

What is Nyad about?

Annette Bening in "Nyad."


Credit: Netflix

In August 1978, a 28-year-old Diana Nyad tried and failed to become the first woman to swim from Havana to Key West, a media spectacle the movie relives in its opening scenes using archival news footage. Most biopics relegate their real-life videos and photographs to their closing credits, but this introduction through the lens of reality helps draw a straight line between the younger version of Diana — who would go on to retire a year later — and the fictionalized version we follow who is in her early sixties, played by Annette Bening.

The curt, sour-faced Diana tends to keep most people at a distance, except for her best friend, Bonnie Stoll (Jodie Foster). The duo dated decades ago but have now become each other’s most important confidants. Bonnie also tries to play wing-woman to Diana, though given the former swimmer’s penchant for directing the flow of the conversation towards her past achievements, this seldom works out. Now 60, Diana drifts through life, unable to find a new purpose as she relives the glory days in the back of her mind — until it hits her. Cuba-to-Miami was the one mountain she was never able to climb. So now she’s going to try again.

Undeterred by every naysayer (including Bonnie, who eventually joins up as her personal trainer), Diana begins reacquainting herself with long-distance swims while planning for the event. Together, they attempt to rope in sponsors, lifeguards, health experts and, most importantly, a navigator to captain a small vessel alongside her as she swims, in order to keep her on course. Back in ’78, she first attempted the feat while swimming in a lengthy shark cage, but now she also wants to be first person to complete the route without one, which experts deem nearly impossible even for athletes at their physical peak.

The film does skirt around some of the real details of this achievement — major ones, like the fact that the route had in fact been completed once before, by Walter Poenisch in July of ’78 — and while movies shouldn’t necessarily be beholden to reality, there’s an iffiness surrounding this particular case. Julia Cox’s screenplay is based on Diana’s 2015 memoir Find a Way, but the athlete herself has proven to be a problematic source on occasion. There’s even an entire website dedicated to debunking and fact-checking her claims, though you wouldn’t clock any of this controversy from the movie, which, if anything, treats Diana as too honest (often gratingly so, to those around her).

At the very least, one has to wonder if the filmmakers didn’t leave valuable dramatic material on the table by not contrasting Diana’s late-in-life drive to complete the swim despite her naysayers with the fact that the real Diana had once smeared Poenisch, who was 64 at the time of his swim, for being too old to complete the route himself. (Poenisch is never mentioned in the film.) Despite Chin and Vasarhelyi’s background in documentary filmmaking, little in their approach to Nyad suggests a search for the truth beyond the confines of the script — the film’s chronology is presented objectively, its subject’s perspective never questioned — though as first-time feature filmmakers, it’s hard to imagine they’d have had much room to futz with Netflix’s vision for a straightforward, feel-good story. 

Regardless, even as a dramatization of true-ish events peppered with lies and embellishments, it proves effective in its portrayal of its central relationship. If there’s one thing Bonnie knows about her best friend, something she loves and hates about her in equal measure, it’s that she won’t take “no” for an answer. So, it’s off to the races, so to speak, as Diana attempts to defeat time, the elements, and the best version of herself from over 30 years ago.

Nyad is a tale of friendship told with great performances.

Annette Bening and Jodei Foster in "Nyad."


Credit: Netflix

While its title hints at one woman’s journey, Nyad is really a story about relationships. Diana is undoubtedly driven, but her unyielding focus lives somewhere between stubbornness and narcissism in a strange way that makes her magnetic. She butts heads constantly with Bonnie, and with her no-nonsense ship captain John Bartlett (Rhys Ifans), but her stern individualism is also responsible for bringing people together through a shared vision of the impossible, as though it were a tale of creative partnership.

As Diana, Bening is sharp-tongued in a way where you aren’t quite sure how self-aware she is. Does she not know that she comes off like a jerk, or does she just not have the time to care? Either way, her abrasiveness is almost always amusing, and it goes hand-in-hand with the tireless physical and emotional ambition that lures people into her orbit. With eyes that dart around the room, and a voice that seems to boom from somewhere deep within her, as though each sentence were a bold proclamation, Bening’s impatient conception of Diana keeps the movie feeling quick and propulsive, even in its handful of languid moments.

Foster’s performance perfectly compliments Bening’s. As Bonnie, she likes to take a beat or two (or ten) before diving headfirst into Diana’s seemingly crazy schemes. With a combination of caution and enthusiasm, she both pulls Diana back from the many ledges on which she finds herself while also helping her push past her limitations, as though Diana were a proxy through whom Bonnie could vicariously live and transcend her own fears of aging and obsolescence. Together, the delightful lesbian duo make a platonic movie partnership for the ages, as they propel Nyad forward through its many scenes of planning, chit-chat, confrontations, and candid confessions of intimate fears.

Rounding out the leading cast is Ifans, whose weary but straight-shooting navigator John butts heads with Diana even more than Bonnie. Where Bonnie has a lifetime of tact in her arsenal, which she molds to Diana’s specific needs and idiosyncrasies, John is a newcomer to their dynamic, and he’s also tasked with the safety of his entire crew as they navigate stormy weather. He rises to meet Diana’s obstinance head-on because it’s a matter of life or death, in more ways than one. In especially stormy conditions, throwing in the towel is a life-saving decision, but pushing forward in the face of possible doom is, ironically, the most life-affirming thing he can do as a member of Diana’s team.

The film also has a key fourth performance, isolated from the aforementioned three, which stands out just as brightly: Anna Harriette Pittman as a teenage version of Diana, who appears in flashbacks. The young actress is tasked with emotionally delicate material, and she handles it with immense assuredness. But while these glimpses into the past are initially exacting, they end up scattered in a way that works against the entire film.

Nyad‘s filmmaking struggles (but ultimately works).

Annette Bening in "Nyad."


Credit: Netflix

Cox’s screenplay features an early flourish that Chin and Vasarhelyi bring to life with momentous passion and energy. When Diana is in the initial stages of blazing her new path, she steps back into a swimming pool for the first time in decades. With each stroke, Nyad flashes back to formative moments from Diana’s childhood, as opening credits appear across the screen. Not only is this an economic way to tell an entire backstory while framing Diana’s swim as a new beginning — the opening titles mark the official “start” of the film — but the act of swimming connects Diana to her past, and to a part of her identity from which she had perhaps closed herself off.

Were this a mere gimmick isolated to the opening credits, it would’ve swiftly served its purpose, but these flashbacks continue to reappear at inopportune moments, usually when Diana is in the water. On paper, the recurrence of these scenes seems to draw a connection between water and Diana’s past, but as memories, they don’t entirely make sense as a repeating facet of her journey.

For one thing, events where the teenage Diana experiences success have the golden haze of recollections, but this gilded texture doesn’t change in any meaningful way when the movie’s flashbacks begin to focus on traumatic experiences, like her sexual assault at the hands of her swim coach. Pittman shoulders the weight of this difficult subplot with a thoughtful depiction of self-doubt, but the way these flashbacks appear as the film goes on becomes increasingly arbitrary and mechanical. In the present, Diana will be focused on the task at hand, with little by way of Bening’s performance to suggest that these memories have much bearing on her in a given moment, and even less by way of the movie’s editing to create a fluid emotional connection between any two past and present scenes.

In fact, when this trauma from decades prior does finally rears its head, Diana convincingly asserts that it’s something she no longer thinks about, despite the movie framing it as an all-encompassing event that defines her. This denial is something that could, in theory, be called into question, as an armor Diana builds around herself, but the result is far too straightforward for such a reading. That this assault is an aspect of Diana’s life she’s written and spoken about at length seems reason enough to include it in the film, but it’s handled without the kind of craft and care that might’ve made it feel in tune with the rest of the film. 

It’s the center of a major disconnect between the filmmaking and writing that’s never resolved; everything from the editing to Bening’s performance suggests that Diana’s unyielding focus on her mission leaves little room for anyone else in the present, let alone a monster from her past. And yet, this element of her backstory prods constantly at the movie’s fabric, as a recurring reminder for the audience but seldom (if ever) a reminder for Diana herself. So, when she eventually claims she hasn’t thought about it in years, the movie itself gives us no reason to doubt her. It becomes a horror far too easily dismissed

As it happens, there’s no dearth of trauma or suffering in the present during Diana’s journey (which her story of assault ought to have either been tied to in some way, or dropped entirely). In fact, it’s during the most arduous hurdles along Diana’s swim that the movie takes on occasional abstract qualities, as though her delirium after several sleepless days in the water had somehow infected the camera too. It’s beautiful and dangerous, representative of both the powerful ocean and the film itself. Nyad breathes with an increasing vitality the closer Diana gets to the Florida coast, recalling the intensity the directing duo brought to their Thai cave rescue documentary The Rescue.

The camera never shies away from her cracked lips or inflamed skin when she’s spent hours in the seawater, and it doesn’t shy away from her wrinkles, either  — or Bonnie’s, for that matter. It’s a movie in which age is both obstacle and strength, and it allows Bening and Foster to play their ages gracefully, as actresses in their sixties. Whatever it struggles to say about bravery in the face of wounds from decades past, it manages to say tenfold about the way its characters choose to live now. Nyad builds to exuberant emotional crescendos that feel straight out of the schmaltzy Hollywood biopic playbook, but these scenes transcend cliché thanks to the emotionally resonant performances at their core.  

Nyad was reviewed out of NewFest 2023. It opened in limited release on Oct. 20 and premieres on Netflix Nov. 3.

Tech / Technology

Missing ‘Dune: Part Two’? Check out these three ‘Dune’-related books.

Posted on:

“Dune: Part Two” may be delayed, but these three books make for the perfect antidote.
Three books against a backdrop of sand dunes.

There is an alternate universe where, come Nov. 3, we’d all be seated for Dune: Part Two‘s theatrical run. But Dune: Part Two‘s release has been pushed back to March 15, 2024.

Luckily, there are still several ways to get into the Arrakis spirit while we wait for March. This fall saw the release of three non-fiction books that delve deep into the world and cultural impact of Frank Herbert’s classic science-fiction tome. From examining the places and people Herbert drew inspiration from to a juicy, behind-the-scenes look at David Lynch’s maligned adaptation and more, these books offer something for Dune novices and experts alike.

Here are three books to read if you’re looking for some extra Dune goodness.

The Spice Must Flow: The Story of Dune, from Cult Novels to Visionary Sci-Fi Movies by Ryan Britt

For a comprehensive look at all things Dune, look no further than The Spice Must Flow. Ryan Britt charts the entire history of the franchise, beginning with Frank Herbert’s scrapped article about sand dunes and ending with Denis Villeneuve’s 2021 film adaptation. In between, you’ll learn about the writing and publishing process behind each Dune novel, as well as the many proposed Dune films that never saw the light of day.

Perhaps most fascinating here is how Britt lays out just how influential Dune is to sci-fi as a whole. Yes, it’s one of the seminal works of the genre, but several Dune-related connections also led to some of the greatest sci-fi films of all time. How did an unmade Dune movie influence Ridley Scott’s Alien? Or Scott’s involvement in Blade Runner, for that matter? And what did Herbert really think about Star Wars, with it many overt similarities to Dune?

Due to the broad scope of The Spice Must Flow, there’s a lot of fictional and real-world ground to cover. That’s entire decades, not to mention thousands of years’ worth of Dune lore! Still, Britt’s guidance through Dune‘s impact on culture proves assured, especially when coupled with interviews with sci-fi historians, actors and directors, as well as members of Herbert’s own family. The Spice Must Flow takes a daunting wealth of subject matter and makes it an accessible, illuminating read that never lets you get lost in the sands.

A Masterpiece in Disarray: David Lynch’s Dune — An Oral History by Max Evry

Decades before Denis Villeneuve put his spin on Dune, director David Lynch spearheaded the first onscreen adaptation of Herbert’s work. The result, released in 1984, was a critical and commercial flop. Chiefest among its problems was how the film struggled to fit all of Dune into its two-hour runtime, leading to a nearly incoherent narrative.

Yet Lynch’s Dune is not without its bright spots, boasting stunning production design and truly fun (if occasionally broad) performances from stars like Kyle MacLachlan, Patrick Stewart, Sean Young, and Sting. Here is a science-fiction film that isn’t afraid to lean into the bizarre, the outlandish, and the ornate — a deep contrast from Villeneuve’s more austere, brutalist interpretation of Herbert’s work. So, how did this wonderfully strange film come to be? And how did it become doomed to fail?

With his book A Masterpiece in Disarray: David Lynch’s Dune — An Oral History, Max Evry dives deep into every facet of Dune‘s production, assembling interviews with actors like MacLachlan and Young, crew members like casting director Jane Jenkins and costume designer Bob Ringwood, and even Lynch himself. You’ll learn about everything from the challenges the crew faced shooting in Mexico to possible money laundering going on behind the scenes. Movie magic!

Clocking in at over 500 pages long, A Masterpiece in Disarray is a dream come true for anyone who loves or is fascinated by the “black sheep of David Lynch’s filmography,” as Evry calls Dune. The oral history sections are the clear standouts, lending new context and character to some of the film’s strangest bits (like Kenneth McMillan’s Baron Harkonnen). Woven through the entire book is a sense of wonder that this beast of a film got made in the first place, even if it ultimately wasn’t the film Lynch wanted to make. If you’re hungry for a deep dive on the oldest Dune adaptation or just want to take a closer look at this strange stumble in Lynch’s career, A Masterpiece in Disarray is the book for you.

The Worlds of Dune: The Places and Cultures that Inspired Frank Herbert by Tom Huddleston

Wonder where Frank Herbert got the ideas for the Bene Gesserit, the Voice, and those sweet, sweet sandworms? The Worlds of Dune by Tom Huddleston seeks to answer all your world-building questions and then some.

Huddleston kicks off our Dune tour on Arrakis before going planet by planet to Caladan, Giedi Prime, and Kaitan. At each stop, he outlines key cultural and geographical aspects of the planet, as well as the real-world inspirations behind them. Some of the inspirations are more obvious, such as Herbert’s use of Arabic words and Islamic theology. Others, like a focus on the field of semantics or anti-Soviet sentiments, are less so, making for some fascinating connections between our world and that of Paul Atreides.

Aside from being well-researched and beautifully printed, complete with illustrations from early editions of Dune and images from the films, The Worlds of Dune is careful to examine Herbert’s legacy. Huddleston pushes back on some of Herbert’s more troubling areas of inspiration, such as the eugenics-based Bene Gesserit breeding program. He also questions whether Herbert’s drawing inspiration from non-white cultures like the San people of the Kalahari Desert or the Quileute tribe of the Pacific Northwest was appropriative, appreciative, or (most likely) a mix of both. Informative and thought-provoking in equal measure, The World of Dune is perfect for people who want a closer look at Dune through religious, historical, and geo-political lenses.

Tech / Technology

How to stream ‘Indiana Jones and The Dial of Destiny’

Posted on:

“Indiana Jones and The Dial of Destiny” is coming to streaming. Here’s everything you need to know.

If you didn’t get a chance to reunite with everyone’s favourite whip-touting, snake-hating archaeologist in the cinema, you’ll soon be able to stream Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny at home.

Released 42 years after the very first film, 1981’s Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny sees Harrison Ford return to his famous role for another treasure-hunting, tomb-raiding, wise-cracking adventure — and this time, there’s added Phoebe Waller-Bridge.

The series’ fifth instalment has so far only been available to watch through video on demand (VOD), but it’s coming to streaming soon, so if you’re keen for a night in with the professor, here’s everything you need to know to watch it at home.

When and where is Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny releasing on streaming? 

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny has been available to watch at home since Aug. 29 but only through VOD platforms including Apple TV, Google Play, and Prime Video (with five behind-the-scenes featurettes, giving big DVD special features energy).

But finally, Dial of Destiny will be streaming on Disney+ on Dec. 1.

On the same day, the streaming service will also drop a Disney+ documentary directed by Laurent Bouzereau called Timeless Heroes: Indiana Jones and Harrison Ford, which tracks the actor’s path to Hollywood and his iconic role, and how the character has remained a steadfast face of pop culture. Ford was interviewed for the documentary as well as Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Kathleen Kennedy, Frank Marshall, James Mangold, and more, so it’s a good one to watch after the film.

What is Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny about? 

Directed by James Mangold, the fifth instalment of Steven Spielberg’s adventure franchise connects Indy’s past and present with a history-altering device, some de-ageing tech, and that glorious score.

Nearing retirement from his heady days of academic and archaeological adventuring, Dr. Henry “Indiana” Jones Jr. is ready to hang up his signature hat. But suddenly, he’s reunited with his goddaughter Helena Shaw (Phoebe Waller-Bridge), whose father (Toby Jones) located Archimedes’ Dial decades ago during World War II — there are scenes of digitally de-aged Ford as a young Indy that will send you right back to Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

Jürgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen) stands in a dimly lit bar in "Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny"

Jürgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen) is also after that dial.
Credit: 2023 Lucasfilm Ltd. & TM

With her young sidekick Teddy Kumar (Ethann Isidore) and Indy begrudgingly in tow, Helena’s on the hunt for the device, which can alter the events of the past. But they’re not the only ones after the dial, as Nazi scientist Jürgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen) is hot on their heels. Their adventure will take them through New York, Tangier, Sicily, and more, through tombs, shipwrecks, car chases, and history itself.

Though Dial of Destiny faced trouble at the box office, the film was lauded by critics, including Mashable’s film editor Kristy Puchko, who writes, “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny is a wondrous return to form for this franchise, as well as a wildly entertaining film fit for the whole family.”

And folks, there’s no post-credits scene, so once the film’s done, you can go right back to your life not fighting villains atop speeding trains.

Who stars in Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny

Harrison Ford, of course, leads as our titular hero, alongside a truly welcome addition to the franchise, Phoebe Waller Bridge as Helena, with Ethann Isidore as her pickpocketing young friend Teddy. Mads Mikkelsen is characteristically superb donning his villain hat, while Toby Jones doesn’t waste a second as Indy’s Oxford professor pal Basil Shaw. Antonio Banderas steals his scenes up as frogman Renaldo, Indy’s old mate and diving extraordinaire.

Familiar faces also return to the franchise including John Rhys-Davies as Sallah, who’s hit the trail with Indiana in Raiders of the Lost Ark and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. And one of the biggest cameos in the film is that of Karen Allen as Marion Ravenwood, who first appeared in Raiders of the Lost Arc then returned for 2008’s Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

To watch Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny, you can stream the film from Disney+ by hitting that button below.

Tech / Technology

Perfect movie to kick off the Christmas season: ‘Anna and the Apocalypse’

Posted on:

Directed by John McPhail, “Anna and the Apocalypse” is a musical holiday horror movie that deserves your attention. “Dickinson”s Ella Hunt stars.
A blood-spattered Anna, played by Ella Hunt, holds a large candy cane weapon.

Do you like Christmas movies, but wish they were gorier? Are you a fan of zombie flicks, but yearn for a zombie musical? Do you want every musical you watch to be full of holiday cheer? Perhaps with some high school drama tossed in the mix? Then, you’re going to want to witness Anna and the Apocalypse. Directed by John McPhail (Dear David) this Christmas-set zombie musical spectacular from 2018 is the perfect transition film to shift horror lovers from spooky season to Yuletide scares.

What’s Anna and the Apocalypse about?

Ella Hunt dances in school in "Anna and the Apocalypse."


Credit: Orion/Vertigo/Kobal/Shutterstock

Christmas is just around the corner in the small Scottish town of Little Haven, and Anna (Dickinson‘s Ella Hunt) is at odds with her father (Mark Benton) about her post-high school plans. Before university next fall, she wants to travel the world. But her dad thinks that would be a waste of time. Unfortunately, the zombie apocalypse doesn’t care about family squabbles. It hits right before Christmas — and right before Anna and her father can reach any kind of resolution.

To save her dad and make it out of town alive, Anna teams up with her devoted best friend John (Malcolm Cumming), snarky student activist Steph (Sarah Swire), plucky aspiring filmmaker Chris (Christopher Leveaux), and school jerk Nick (Ben Wiggins). What follows is a mad scramble for survival with a healthy dose of Broadway flair.

Anna and the Apocalypse is a comedy that takes its musical numbers seriously.

Ella Hunt wanders among zombies.


Credit: Orion/Vertigo/Kobal/Shutterstock

The musical numbers are the highlight of Anna and the Apocalypse, launching an already-enjoyable Christmas horror movie into the stratosphere. Take the earnest and angsty “Hollywood Ending.” Sung by students in their school cafeteria and complemented by lunch tray choreography, this tune with High School Musical vibes reminds us that life is not at all like the teen movies — something that Anna and the Apocalypse‘s ending takes to heart.

Also of note is the cheerful, poppy “Turning My Life Around.” In this chipper song, Anna and John walk/dance to school, earbuds in and singing their hearts out —oblivious to the zombie carnage playing out all around them. It’s a delightfully ironic scene, one that calls to mind a similar sequence of apocalyptic unawareness from Shaun of the Dead.

My favorite song on the whole soundtrack has to be Nick’s “Soldier at War,” an epic zombie-killing anthem reminiscent of “Eye of the Tiger.” The number is Anna and the Apocalypse at its most fun. Nick and his fellow bullies kill zombies using everything from bats to watermelons to video game controllers. On the one hand, it’s an absolute banger of a song that will no doubt get stuck in your head. On the other hand, it’s a ridiculous example of posturing in the face of death — with Wiggins selling the arrogance with charismatic gusto. However, Anna and Steph’s unimpressed expressions are an excellent contrast to Nick’s musical bragging.

Anna and the Apocalypse has fun with holiday horror — and gore.

Ella Hunt as Anna Shepherd and Malcolm Cumming as John in "Anna and the Apocalypse."


Credit: Orion/Vertigo/Kobal/Shutterstock

This being a zombie movie, there’s plenty of violence to go around — only here it comes with a Christmas twist. Anna and John encounter zombies dressed as snowmen and Santa. The undead crash the school’s holiday concert and invade a Christmas tree emporium. Anna’s weapon of choice in the final act is a big, sharpened prop candy cane, because why not? It’s a gleefully unhinged way to get into the holiday spirit.

In addition to all the genre-melding, Anna and the Apocalypse makes a real effort to examine how teenagers on the brink of adulthood come to terms with the apocalypse. Turns out the sudden arrival of zombies really puts your life in perspective. Anna worries about her future and her relationship with her father. Meanwhile, John struggles to admit his romantic feelings for Anna in what ends up being a solid subversion of the Nice Guy trope.

These more dramatic emotional beats don’t always land. For instance, a subplot involving a control freak teacher (Paul Kaye) escalates unbelievably quickly. But Anna and the Apocalypse certainly gets points for trying. Using a zombie apocalypse, Christmas, and catchy tunes to tackle teenage anxieties is no small feat, and the movie sometimes falters as a result of its own ambition. Fortunately, you’ll be too distracted by fun set pieces and the cast’s fully committed performances to care that much.

So sharpen your candy canes, warm up your vocal cords, and start your December off right with Anna and her friends. And zombies.

Anna and the Apocalypse is now streaming on Shudder, and is also available on Apple TV+, Amazon Prime, Vudu, and more.

UPDATE: Oct. 31, 2023, 10:47 a.m. EDT This post has been updated to reflect Anna and the Apocalypse’s current streaming availability.

Tech / Technology

Apple 10/30 event: The entire ‘Scary Fast’ live stream was filmed on iPhone

Posted on:

Apple used the iPhone 15 Pro Max to film the ‘Scary Fast’ live stream.
Apple event filmed on iPhone

My jaw dropped when I read the final words of Apple’s “Scary Fast” Mac event: “This event was shot on iPhone.”

You mean to tell me that while Apple showcased its refreshed M3-series MacBook Pros and iMac, and even dropped a stunning new Space Black colorway for the M3 Pro and the M3 Max Macs, all of that spooky pomp and circumstance was filmed on a smartphone? No way!

Tim Cook walking into the 'Scary Fast' Mac event

Tim Cook walking into the ‘Scary Fast’ Mac event
Credit: Apple

Which iPhone did Apple use for the ‘Scary Fast’ Mac event?

Apple used the iPhone 15 Pro Max to film the Apple ‘Scary Fast’ event and we are shook. I mean, we knew that the iPhone 15 Pro Max had industry-leading camera specs. Check out some of the top-notch features below:

  • 4K video recording up to 60 fps

  • Cinematic Mode (a rack-focus feature introduced with iPhone 13 Pro models) up to 4K HDR at 30 fps

  • Action Mode (a feature that introduces stabilization for high-activity recording) at 60 fps

  • HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps

  • ProRes video recording up to 4K at 60ps (ProRes is an Apple-developed compressed video format that produces high-quality files for video production)

  • Macro video recording, including slo-mo and time-lapse

  • Slo-mo video support for 1080p at up to 240 fps

Plus, as we tested in our review with the iPhone 15 Pro Max, the Pro camera system blew us away with its sharp 48MP wide camera and 12MP ultra-wide shooter. It’s also packed with two telephoto cameras — one of ’em consists of Apple’s star-of-the-show “tetraprism design” that enables up to 5x optical zoom.

However, by putting these envelope-pushing specs into practice, Apple really put iPhone 15 Pro Max’s capabilities into perspective.

A professional filmmaker directed the event

Apple tapped into Brian Oakes, the man behind Jim: The James Foley Story and Living with Lincoln, to film the “Scary Fast” Mac event.

“We were able to get the same complex shots with iPhone 15 Pro Max,” Oakes said. “It’s amazing to see that the quality from a device that is so small and so portable can rival a large $20,000 camera.”

Jon Carr, Apple’s Pro Workflow Video Specialist, was also flabbergasted that the event was filmed with a “tiny little iPhone” that powered 50 monitors with USB-C out. “This whole piece was low-light, and low-light is a little bit more challenging. And we nailed that.”

Scary Fast livestream filmed with iPhone 15 Pro Max

Scary Fast livestream filmed with iPhone 15 Pro Max
Credit: Apple

But of course, Apple still deployed some of the traditional top-level equipment you see on any major film set, including cranes, dollies, drones, and more.

Apple transparently revealed that it used the Blackmagic Camera app, an iOS exclusive, to film “Scary Fast,” which adds Hollywood feature film-esque digital camera controls.

The new iDevices Apple revealed at the event include the 14-inch M3 MacBook Pro, the 14-inch and 16-inch M3 Pro and M3 Max MacBook Pro models, and an M3 iMac. For a more in-depth look of everything announced at the event, click here.